Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightAPPF vs IIIV
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q1 2026

Summary Verdict

APPF: 2IIIV: 3wins
Rule of 40
33.4APPF
42.3IIIV
check_circleIIIV leads
Revenue Growth
21.5%APPF
17.7%IIIV
check_circleAPPF leads
Gross Margin
86%APPF
150%IIIV
check_circleIIIV leads
FCF Margin
11.9%APPF
24.6%IIIV
check_circleIIIV leads
Operating Margin
16.6%APPF
2.5%IIIV
check_circleAPPF leads
NRR
APPF
IIIV
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
APPF
33.4
IIIV
42.3check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
APPF
21.5%check_circle
IIIV
17.7%
Gross Margin% of revenue
APPF
86%
IIIV
150%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
APPF
11.9%
IIIV
24.6%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
APPF
16.6%check_circle
IIIV
2.5%
NRRNet retention
APPF
N/A
IIIV
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
APPF
N/A
IIIV
N/A
Market CapUSD
APPF
N/A
IIIV
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
APPF
N/A
IIIV
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
APPF
N/A
IIIV
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q1 2026, AppFolio, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus i3 Verticals, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, AppFolio, Inc. scores 33.4 compared to i3 Verticals, Inc.'s 42.3, placing i3 Verticals, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at AppFolio, Inc. 86% vs i3 Verticals, Inc. 150%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

personAppFolio, Inc. Profilepersoni3 Verticals, Inc. ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons