Summary Verdict
CARG: 5—DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
45.5CARG
-37.4DDD
check_circleCARG leads
Revenue Growth
13.7%CARG
-12.1%DDD
check_circleCARG leads
Gross Margin
93%CARG
34%DDD
check_circleCARG leads
FCF Margin
31.9%CARG
-25.3%DDD
check_circleCARG leads
Operating Margin
26.9%CARG
-24.8%DDD
check_circleCARG leads
NRR
—CARG
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CARG
45.5check_circle
DDD
-37.4
Revenue GrowthYoY
CARG
13.7%check_circle
DDD
-12.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CARG
93%check_circle
DDD
34%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CARG
31.9%check_circle
DDD
-25.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
CARG
26.9%check_circle
DDD
-24.8%
NRRNet retention
CARG
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CARG
N/A
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
CARG
N/A
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
CARG
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CARG
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, CarGurus, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, CarGurus, Inc. scores 45.5 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -37.4, placing CarGurus, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at CarGurus, Inc. 93% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 34%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.