Summary Verdict
CARG: 5—DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
41.6CARG
-44.1DDD
check_circleCARG leads
Revenue Growth
18.0%CARG
-14.5%DDD
check_circleCARG leads
Gross Margin
89%CARG
35%DDD
check_circleCARG leads
FCF Margin
23.6%CARG
-29.6%DDD
check_circleCARG leads
Operating Margin
18.1%CARG
-21.3%DDD
check_circleCARG leads
NRR
—CARG
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CARG
41.6check_circle
DDD
-44.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
CARG
18.0%check_circle
DDD
-14.5%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CARG
89%check_circle
DDD
35%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CARG
23.6%check_circle
DDD
-29.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
CARG
18.1%check_circle
DDD
-21.3%
NRRNet retention
CARG
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CARG
N/A
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
CARG
N/A
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
CARG
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CARG
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, CarGurus, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, CarGurus, Inc. scores 41.6 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -44.1, placing CarGurus, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at CarGurus, Inc. 89% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.