analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 2—PRCH: 3wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
29.8PRCH
check_circlePRCH leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
32.8%PRCH
check_circlePRCH leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
77%PRCH
check_circlePRCH leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
-3.0%PRCH
check_circleALRM leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
7.7%PRCH
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—ALRM
—PRCH
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7
PRCH
29.8check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%
PRCH
32.8%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
PRCH
77%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%check_circle
PRCH
-3.0%
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%check_circle
PRCH
7.7%
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
PRCH
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
PRCH
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
PRCH
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
PRCH
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
PRCH
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Porch Group, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to Porch Group, Inc.'s 29.8, placing Porch Group, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs Porch Group, Inc. 77%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.