analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 0—CARG: 5wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
41.6CARG
check_circleCARG leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
18.0%CARG
check_circleCARG leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
89%CARG
check_circleCARG leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
23.6%CARG
check_circleCARG leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
18.1%CARG
check_circleCARG leads
NRR
—ALRM
—CARG
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7
CARG
41.6check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%
CARG
18.0%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
CARG
89%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%
CARG
23.6%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%
CARG
18.1%check_circle
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
CARG
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
CARG
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
CARG
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
CARG
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
CARG
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus CarGurus, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to CarGurus, Inc.'s 41.6, placing CarGurus, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs CarGurus, Inc. 89%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.