Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightACIW vs WK
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q1 2026

Summary Verdict

ACIW: 2WK: 3wins
Rule of 40
24.2ACIW
33.5WK
check_circleWK leads
Revenue Growth
6.9%ACIW
20.9%WK
check_circleWK leads
Gross Margin
47%ACIW
78%WK
check_circleWK leads
FCF Margin
17.3%ACIW
12.7%WK
check_circleACIW leads
Operating Margin
16.4%ACIW
-3.9%WK
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
ACIW
WK
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ACIW
24.2
WK
33.5check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ACIW
6.9%
WK
20.9%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ACIW
47%
WK
78%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ACIW
17.3%check_circle
WK
12.7%
Operating MarginGAAP
ACIW
16.4%check_circle
WK
-3.9%
NRRNet retention
ACIW
N/A
WK
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ACIW
N/A
WK
N/A
Market CapUSD
ACIW
N/A
WK
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ACIW
N/A
WK
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ACIW
N/A
WK
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q1 2026, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus WORKIVA INC at N/A. On the Rule of 40, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. scores 24.2 compared to WORKIVA INC's 33.5, placing WORKIVA INC ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 47% vs WORKIVA INC 78%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

personACI WORLDWIDE, INC. ProfilepersonWORKIVA INC ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons