Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightWK vs ACIW
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q4 2025

Summary Verdict

WK: 3ACIW: 2wins
Rule of 40
35.4WK
28.0ACIW
check_circleWK leads
Revenue Growth
19.8%WK
10.4%ACIW
check_circleWK leads
Gross Margin
78%WK
49%ACIW
check_circleWK leads
FCF Margin
15.6%WK
17.6%ACIW
check_circleACIW leads
Operating Margin
-4.8%WK
18.8%ACIW
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
WK
ACIW
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
WK
35.4check_circle
ACIW
28.0
Revenue GrowthYoY
WK
19.8%check_circle
ACIW
10.4%
Gross Margin% of revenue
WK
78%check_circle
ACIW
49%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
WK
15.6%
ACIW
17.6%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
WK
-4.8%
ACIW
18.8%check_circle
NRRNet retention
WK
N/A
ACIW
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
WK
N/A
ACIW
N/A
Market CapUSD
WK
N/A
ACIW
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
WK
N/A
ACIW
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
WK
N/A
ACIW
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q4 2025, WORKIVA INC trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, WORKIVA INC scores 35.4 compared to ACI WORLDWIDE, INC.'s 28.0, placing WORKIVA INC ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at WORKIVA INC 78% vs ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 49%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

personWORKIVA INC ProfilepersonACI WORLDWIDE, INC. ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons