analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
TTAN: 3—ALRM: 2wins
Rule of 40
35.5TTAN
21.1ALRM
check_circleTTAN leads
Revenue Growth
24.5%TTAN
7.6%ALRM
check_circleTTAN leads
Gross Margin
70%TTAN
66%ALRM
check_circleTTAN leads
FCF Margin
11.0%TTAN
13.6%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
Operating Margin
-17.6%TTAN
13.2%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—TTAN
—ALRM
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
TTAN
35.5check_circle
ALRM
21.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
TTAN
24.5%check_circle
ALRM
7.6%
Gross Margin% of revenue
TTAN
70%check_circle
ALRM
66%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
TTAN
11.0%
ALRM
13.6%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
TTAN
-17.6%
ALRM
13.2%check_circle
NRRNet retention
TTAN
N/A
ALRM
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
TTAN
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Market CapUSD
TTAN
N/A
ALRM
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
TTAN
N/A
ALRM
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
TTAN
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, ServiceTitan, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, ServiceTitan, Inc. scores 35.5 compared to Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.'s 21.1, placing ServiceTitan, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at ServiceTitan, Inc. 70% vs Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.