analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 2—SSNC: 3wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
22.0SSNC
check_circleSSNC leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
6.5%SSNC
check_circleALRM leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
48%SSNC
check_circleALRM leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
15.5%SSNC
check_circleSSNC leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
23.4%SSNC
check_circleSSNC leads
NRR
—ALRM
—SSNC
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7
SSNC
22.0check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%check_circle
SSNC
6.5%
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%check_circle
SSNC
48%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%
SSNC
15.5%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%
SSNC
23.4%check_circle
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
SSNC
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
SSNC
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
SSNC
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
SSNC
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
SSNC
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc's 22.0, placing SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc 48%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.