analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
SOUN: 2—ALRM: 3wins
Rule of 40
40.8SOUN
21.1ALRM
check_circleSOUN leads
Revenue Growth
99.5%SOUN
7.6%ALRM
check_circleSOUN leads
Gross Margin
42%SOUN
66%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
FCF Margin
-58.7%SOUN
13.6%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
Operating Margin
-13.8%SOUN
13.2%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—SOUN
—ALRM
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
SOUN
40.8check_circle
ALRM
21.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
SOUN
99.5%check_circle
ALRM
7.6%
Gross Margin% of revenue
SOUN
42%
ALRM
66%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
SOUN
-58.7%
ALRM
13.6%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
SOUN
-13.8%
ALRM
13.2%check_circle
NRRNet retention
SOUN
N/A
ALRM
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
SOUN
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Market CapUSD
SOUN
N/A
ALRM
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
SOUN
N/A
ALRM
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
SOUN
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, SOUNDHOUND AI, INC. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, SOUNDHOUND AI, INC. scores 40.8 compared to Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.'s 21.1, placing SOUNDHOUND AI, INC. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at SOUNDHOUND AI, INC. 42% vs Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.