analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
DDD: 0—SEMR: 5wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
30.8SEMR
check_circleSEMR leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
17.7%SEMR
check_circleSEMR leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
81%SEMR
check_circleSEMR leads
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
13.0%SEMR
check_circleSEMR leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
-5.1%SEMR
check_circleSEMR leads
NRR
—DDD
—SEMR
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
SEMR
30.8check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
SEMR
17.7%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%
SEMR
81%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%
SEMR
13.0%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%
SEMR
-5.1%check_circle
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
SEMR
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
SEMR
3.5x
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
SEMR
$1.8B
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
SEMR
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
SEMR
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus SEMrush Holdings, Inc. at 3.5x. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to SEMrush Holdings, Inc.'s 30.8, placing SEMrush Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35% vs SEMrush Holdings, Inc. 81%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.