analyticsCommunications
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
RNG: 1—ZM: 4wins
Rule of 40
24.3RNG
43.9ZM
check_circleZM leads
Revenue Growth
4.8%RNG
4.2%ZM
check_circleRNG leads
Gross Margin
71%RNG
77%ZM
check_circleZM leads
FCF Margin
19.5%RNG
39.7%ZM
check_circleZM leads
Operating Margin
5.1%RNG
24.4%ZM
check_circleZM leads
NRR
—RNG
—ZM
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
RNG
24.3
ZM
43.9check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
RNG
4.8%check_circle
ZM
4.2%
Gross Margin% of revenue
RNG
71%
ZM
77%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
RNG
19.5%
ZM
39.7%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
RNG
5.1%
ZM
24.4%check_circle
NRRNet retention
RNG
N/A
ZM
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
RNG
2.0xcheck_circle
ZM
5.8x
Market CapUSD
RNG
$3.8B
ZM
$29.8Bcheck_circle
ARR GrowthYoY
RNG
N/A
ZM
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
RNG
N/A
ZM
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, RingCentral, Inc. trades at 2.0x EV/Revenue versus Zoom Communications, Inc. at 5.8x. On the Rule of 40, RingCentral, Inc. scores 24.3 compared to Zoom Communications, Inc.'s 43.9, placing Zoom Communications, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at RingCentral, Inc. 71% vs Zoom Communications, Inc. 77%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Communications sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.