analyticsCommunications
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
RNG: 4—FIVN: 1wins
Rule of 40
24.3RNG
23.4FIVN
check_circleRNG leads
Revenue Growth
4.8%RNG
10.8%FIVN
check_circleFIVN leads
Gross Margin
71%RNG
55%FIVN
check_circleRNG leads
FCF Margin
19.5%RNG
12.7%FIVN
check_circleRNG leads
Operating Margin
5.1%RNG
2.4%FIVN
check_circleRNG leads
NRR
—RNG
—FIVN
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
RNG
24.3check_circle
FIVN
23.4
Revenue GrowthYoY
RNG
4.8%
FIVN
10.8%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
RNG
71%check_circle
FIVN
55%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
RNG
19.5%check_circle
FIVN
12.7%
Operating MarginGAAP
RNG
5.1%check_circle
FIVN
2.4%
NRRNet retention
RNG
N/A
FIVN
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
RNG
2.0x
FIVN
1.7xcheck_circle
Market CapUSD
RNG
$3.8Bcheck_circle
FIVN
$1.9B
ARR GrowthYoY
RNG
N/A
FIVN
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
RNG
N/A
FIVN
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, RingCentral, Inc. trades at 2.0x EV/Revenue versus Five9, Inc. at 1.7x. On the Rule of 40, RingCentral, Inc. scores 24.3 compared to Five9, Inc.'s 23.4, placing RingCentral, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at RingCentral, Inc. 71% vs Five9, Inc. 55%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Communications sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.