Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightDDD vs RDVT
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q1 2026

Summary Verdict

DDD: 0RDVT: 4wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
41.8RDVT
check_circleRDVT leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
23.3%RDVT
check_circleRDVT leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
RDVT
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
18.6%RDVT
check_circleRDVT leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
18.3%RDVT
check_circleRDVT leads
NRR
DDD
RDVT
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
RDVT
41.8check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
RDVT
23.3%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%
RDVT
N/A
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%
RDVT
18.6%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%
RDVT
18.3%check_circle
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
RDVT
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
RDVT
N/A
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
RDVT
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
RDVT
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
RDVT
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Red Violet, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to Red Violet, Inc.'s 41.8, placing Red Violet, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

person3D SYSTEMS CORP ProfilepersonRed Violet, Inc. ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons