analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 0—RDVT: 4wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
41.8RDVT
check_circleRDVT leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
23.3%RDVT
check_circleRDVT leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
—RDVT
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
18.6%RDVT
check_circleRDVT leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
18.3%RDVT
check_circleRDVT leads
NRR
—ALRM
—RDVT
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7
RDVT
41.8check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%
RDVT
23.3%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
RDVT
N/A
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%
RDVT
18.6%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%
RDVT
18.3%check_circle
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
RDVT
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
RDVT
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
RDVT
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
RDVT
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
RDVT
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Red Violet, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to Red Violet, Inc.'s 41.8, placing Red Violet, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.