analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
RAMP: 4—ACIW: 1wins
Rule of 40
40.2RAMP
28.0ACIW
check_circleRAMP leads
Revenue Growth
21.6%RAMP
10.4%ACIW
check_circleRAMP leads
Gross Margin
66%RAMP
49%ACIW
check_circleRAMP leads
FCF Margin
18.6%RAMP
17.6%ACIW
check_circleRAMP leads
Operating Margin
0.7%RAMP
18.8%ACIW
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
—RAMP
—ACIW
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
RAMP
40.2check_circle
ACIW
28.0
Revenue GrowthYoY
RAMP
21.6%check_circle
ACIW
10.4%
Gross Margin% of revenue
RAMP
66%check_circle
ACIW
49%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
RAMP
18.6%check_circle
ACIW
17.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
RAMP
0.7%
ACIW
18.8%check_circle
NRRNet retention
RAMP
N/A
ACIW
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
RAMP
2.2x
ACIW
N/A
Market CapUSD
RAMP
$1.8B
ACIW
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
RAMP
N/A
ACIW
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
RAMP
N/A
ACIW
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. trades at 2.2x EV/Revenue versus ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. scores 40.2 compared to ACI WORLDWIDE, INC.'s 28.0, placing LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. 66% vs ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 49%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.