Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightACIW vs RAMP
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q1 2026

Summary Verdict

ACIW: 3RAMP: 2wins
Rule of 40
24.2ACIW
3.2RAMP
check_circleACIW leads
Revenue Growth
6.9%ACIW
7.6%RAMP
check_circleRAMP leads
Gross Margin
47%ACIW
71%RAMP
check_circleRAMP leads
FCF Margin
17.3%ACIW
-4.4%RAMP
check_circleACIW leads
Operating Margin
16.4%ACIW
10.3%RAMP
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
ACIW
RAMP
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ACIW
24.2check_circle
RAMP
3.2
Revenue GrowthYoY
ACIW
6.9%
RAMP
7.6%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ACIW
47%
RAMP
71%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ACIW
17.3%check_circle
RAMP
-4.4%
Operating MarginGAAP
ACIW
16.4%check_circle
RAMP
10.3%
NRRNet retention
ACIW
N/A
RAMP
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ACIW
N/A
RAMP
N/A
Market CapUSD
ACIW
N/A
RAMP
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ACIW
N/A
RAMP
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ACIW
N/A
RAMP
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q1 2026, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. scores 24.2 compared to LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.'s 3.2, placing ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 47% vs LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. 71%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

personACI WORLDWIDE, INC. ProfilepersonLiveRamp Holdings, Inc. ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons