Summary Verdict
QTWO: 5—DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
38.6QTWO
-37.4DDD
check_circleQTWO leads
Revenue Growth
14.1%QTWO
-12.1%DDD
check_circleQTWO leads
Gross Margin
54%QTWO
34%DDD
check_circleQTWO leads
FCF Margin
24.5%QTWO
-25.3%DDD
check_circleQTWO leads
Operating Margin
5.0%QTWO
-24.8%DDD
check_circleQTWO leads
NRR
—QTWO
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
QTWO
38.6check_circle
DDD
-37.4
Revenue GrowthYoY
QTWO
14.1%check_circle
DDD
-12.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
QTWO
54%check_circle
DDD
34%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
QTWO
24.5%check_circle
DDD
-25.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
QTWO
5.0%check_circle
DDD
-24.8%
NRRNet retention
QTWO
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
QTWO
N/A
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
QTWO
N/A
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
QTWO
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
QTWO
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, Q2 Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Q2 Holdings, Inc. scores 38.6 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -37.4, placing Q2 Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Q2 Holdings, Inc. 54% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 34%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.