Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightQTWO vs ACIW
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q4 2025

Summary Verdict

QTWO: 4ACIW: 1wins
Rule of 40
38.6QTWO
28.0ACIW
check_circleQTWO leads
Revenue Growth
14.1%QTWO
10.4%ACIW
check_circleQTWO leads
Gross Margin
54%QTWO
49%ACIW
check_circleQTWO leads
FCF Margin
24.5%QTWO
17.6%ACIW
check_circleQTWO leads
Operating Margin
5.0%QTWO
18.8%ACIW
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
QTWO
ACIW
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
QTWO
38.6check_circle
ACIW
28.0
Revenue GrowthYoY
QTWO
14.1%check_circle
ACIW
10.4%
Gross Margin% of revenue
QTWO
54%check_circle
ACIW
49%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
QTWO
24.5%check_circle
ACIW
17.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
QTWO
5.0%
ACIW
18.8%check_circle
NRRNet retention
QTWO
N/A
ACIW
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
QTWO
N/A
ACIW
N/A
Market CapUSD
QTWO
N/A
ACIW
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
QTWO
N/A
ACIW
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
QTWO
N/A
ACIW
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q4 2025, Q2 Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Q2 Holdings, Inc. scores 38.6 compared to ACI WORLDWIDE, INC.'s 28.0, placing Q2 Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Q2 Holdings, Inc. 54% vs ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 49%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

personQ2 Holdings, Inc. ProfilepersonACI WORLDWIDE, INC. ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons