analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q2 2024
Summary Verdict
PWSC: 4—DDD: 1wins
Rule of 40
-21.0PWSC
-44.1DDD
check_circlePWSC leads
Revenue Growth
16.2%PWSC
-14.5%DDD
check_circlePWSC leads
Gross Margin
59%PWSC
35%DDD
check_circlePWSC leads
FCF Margin
-37.1%PWSC
-29.6%DDD
check_circleDDD leads
Operating Margin
2.3%PWSC
-21.3%DDD
check_circlePWSC leads
NRR
—PWSC
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
PWSC
-21.0check_circle
DDD
-44.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
PWSC
16.2%check_circle
DDD
-14.5%
Gross Margin% of revenue
PWSC
59%check_circle
DDD
35%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
PWSC
-37.1%
DDD
-29.6%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
PWSC
2.3%check_circle
DDD
-21.3%
NRRNet retention
PWSC
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
PWSC
6.2x
DDD
1.5xcheck_circle
Market CapUSD
PWSC
$3.8Bcheck_circle
DDD
$524.6M
ARR GrowthYoY
PWSC
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
PWSC
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q2 2024, PowerSchool Holdings, Inc. trades at 6.2x EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at 1.5x. On the Rule of 40, PowerSchool Holdings, Inc. scores -21.0 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -44.1, placing PowerSchool Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at PowerSchool Holdings, Inc. 59% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.