analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
PRGS: 5—DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
52.7PRGS
-37.4DDD
check_circlePRGS leads
Revenue Growth
29.1%PRGS
-12.1%DDD
check_circlePRGS leads
Gross Margin
81%PRGS
34%DDD
check_circlePRGS leads
FCF Margin
23.6%PRGS
-25.3%DDD
check_circlePRGS leads
Operating Margin
15.8%PRGS
-24.8%DDD
check_circlePRGS leads
NRR
—PRGS
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
PRGS
52.7check_circle
DDD
-37.4
Revenue GrowthYoY
PRGS
29.1%check_circle
DDD
-12.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
PRGS
81%check_circle
DDD
34%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
PRGS
23.6%check_circle
DDD
-25.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
PRGS
15.8%check_circle
DDD
-24.8%
NRRNet retention
PRGS
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
PRGS
2.6x
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
PRGS
$1.1B
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
PRGS
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
PRGS
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA trades at 2.6x EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA scores 52.7 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -37.4, placing PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA 81% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 34%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.