analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 0—PRGS: 5wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
57.9PRGS
check_circlePRGS leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
29.1%PRGS
check_circlePRGS leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
81%PRGS
check_circlePRGS leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
28.8%PRGS
check_circlePRGS leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
16.6%PRGS
check_circlePRGS leads
NRR
—ALRM
—PRGS
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7
PRGS
57.9check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%
PRGS
29.1%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
PRGS
81%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%
PRGS
28.8%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%
PRGS
16.6%check_circle
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
PRGS
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
PRGS
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
PRGS
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
PRGS
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
PRGS
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA's 57.9, placing PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA 81%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.