Summary Verdict
PD: 4—EGHT: 1wins
Rule of 40
28.1PD
8.5EGHT
check_circlePD leads
Revenue Growth
5.4%PD
0.1%EGHT
check_circlePD leads
Gross Margin
85%PD
67%EGHT
check_circlePD leads
FCF Margin
22.7%PD
8.4%EGHT
check_circlePD leads
Operating Margin
1.2%PD
2.1%EGHT
check_circleEGHT leads
NRR
—PD
—EGHT
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
PD
28.1check_circle
EGHT
8.5
Revenue GrowthYoY
PD
5.4%check_circle
EGHT
0.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
PD
85%check_circle
EGHT
67%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
PD
22.7%check_circle
EGHT
8.4%
Operating MarginGAAP
PD
1.2%
EGHT
2.1%check_circle
NRRNet retention
PD
N/A
EGHT
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
PD
N/A
EGHT
0.8x
Market CapUSD
PD
N/A
EGHT
$266.1M
ARR GrowthYoY
PD
N/A
EGHT
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
PD
N/A
EGHT
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, PagerDuty, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 8X8 INC /DE/ at 0.8x. On the Rule of 40, PagerDuty, Inc. scores 28.1 compared to 8X8 INC /DE/'s 8.5, placing PagerDuty, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at PagerDuty, Inc. 85% vs 8X8 INC /DE/ 67%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.