Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightDDD vs PD
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q1 2026

Summary Verdict

DDD: 0PD: 5wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
29.8PD
check_circlePD leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
4.5%PD
check_circlePD leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
85%PD
check_circlePD leads
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
25.3%PD
check_circlePD leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
2.1%PD
check_circlePD leads
NRR
DDD
PD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
PD
29.8check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
PD
4.5%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%
PD
85%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%
PD
25.3%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%
PD
2.1%check_circle
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
PD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
PD
N/A
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
PD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
PD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
PD
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus PagerDuty, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to PagerDuty, Inc.'s 29.8, placing PagerDuty, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35% vs PagerDuty, Inc. 85%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

person3D SYSTEMS CORP ProfilepersonPagerDuty, Inc. ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons