Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightPD vs DDD
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q1 2026

Summary Verdict

PD: 5DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
28.1PD
-37.4DDD
check_circlePD leads
Revenue Growth
5.4%PD
-12.1%DDD
check_circlePD leads
Gross Margin
85%PD
34%DDD
check_circlePD leads
FCF Margin
22.7%PD
-25.3%DDD
check_circlePD leads
Operating Margin
1.2%PD
-24.8%DDD
check_circlePD leads
NRR
PD
DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
PD
28.1check_circle
DDD
-37.4
Revenue GrowthYoY
PD
5.4%check_circle
DDD
-12.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
PD
85%check_circle
DDD
34%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
PD
22.7%check_circle
DDD
-25.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
PD
1.2%check_circle
DDD
-24.8%
NRRNet retention
PD
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
PD
N/A
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
PD
N/A
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
PD
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
PD
N/A
DDD
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q1 2026, PagerDuty, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, PagerDuty, Inc. scores 28.1 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -37.4, placing PagerDuty, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at PagerDuty, Inc. 85% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 34%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

personPagerDuty, Inc. Profileperson3D SYSTEMS CORP ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons