Summary Verdict
ACIW: 2—PD: 3wins
Rule of 40
24.2ACIW
29.8PD
check_circlePD leads
Revenue Growth
6.9%ACIW
4.5%PD
check_circleACIW leads
Gross Margin
47%ACIW
85%PD
check_circlePD leads
FCF Margin
17.3%ACIW
25.3%PD
check_circlePD leads
Operating Margin
16.4%ACIW
2.1%PD
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
—ACIW
—PD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ACIW
24.2
PD
29.8check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ACIW
6.9%check_circle
PD
4.5%
Gross Margin% of revenue
ACIW
47%
PD
85%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ACIW
17.3%
PD
25.3%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
ACIW
16.4%check_circle
PD
2.1%
NRRNet retention
ACIW
N/A
PD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ACIW
N/A
PD
N/A
Market CapUSD
ACIW
N/A
PD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ACIW
N/A
PD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ACIW
N/A
PD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus PagerDuty, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. scores 24.2 compared to PagerDuty, Inc.'s 29.8, placing PagerDuty, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 47% vs PagerDuty, Inc. 85%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.