Summary Verdict
OOMA: 5—DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
28.8OOMA
-37.4DDD
check_circleOOMA leads
Revenue Growth
9.5%OOMA
-12.1%DDD
check_circleOOMA leads
Gross Margin
146%OOMA
34%DDD
check_circleOOMA leads
FCF Margin
19.3%OOMA
-25.3%DDD
check_circleOOMA leads
Operating Margin
3.7%OOMA
-24.8%DDD
check_circleOOMA leads
NRR
—OOMA
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
OOMA
28.8check_circle
DDD
-37.4
Revenue GrowthYoY
OOMA
9.5%check_circle
DDD
-12.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
OOMA
146%check_circle
DDD
34%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
OOMA
19.3%check_circle
DDD
-25.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
OOMA
3.7%check_circle
DDD
-24.8%
NRRNet retention
OOMA
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
OOMA
4.1x
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
OOMA
$441.6M
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
OOMA
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
OOMA
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q2 2018, OOMA INC trades at 4.1x EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, OOMA INC scores 28.8 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -37.4, placing OOMA INC ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at OOMA INC 146% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 34%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.