Summary Verdict
OOMA: 3—ACIW: 2wins
Rule of 40
28.8OOMA
28.0ACIW
check_circleOOMA leads
Revenue Growth
9.5%OOMA
10.4%ACIW
check_circleACIW leads
Gross Margin
146%OOMA
49%ACIW
check_circleOOMA leads
FCF Margin
19.3%OOMA
17.6%ACIW
check_circleOOMA leads
Operating Margin
3.7%OOMA
18.8%ACIW
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
—OOMA
—ACIW
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
OOMA
28.8check_circle
ACIW
28.0
Revenue GrowthYoY
OOMA
9.5%
ACIW
10.4%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
OOMA
146%check_circle
ACIW
49%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
OOMA
19.3%check_circle
ACIW
17.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
OOMA
3.7%
ACIW
18.8%check_circle
NRRNet retention
OOMA
N/A
ACIW
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
OOMA
4.1x
ACIW
N/A
Market CapUSD
OOMA
$441.6M
ACIW
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
OOMA
N/A
ACIW
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
OOMA
N/A
ACIW
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q2 2018, OOMA INC trades at 4.1x EV/Revenue versus ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, OOMA INC scores 28.8 compared to ACI WORLDWIDE, INC.'s 28.0, placing OOMA INC ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at OOMA INC 146% vs ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 49%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.