analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 2—NTSK: 3wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
28.9NTSK
check_circleNTSK leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
26.7%NTSK
check_circleNTSK leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
67%NTSK
check_circleNTSK leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
2.2%NTSK
check_circleALRM leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
-96.0%NTSK
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—ALRM
—NTSK
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7
NTSK
28.9check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%
NTSK
26.7%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
NTSK
67%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%check_circle
NTSK
2.2%
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%check_circle
NTSK
-96.0%
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
NTSK
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
NTSK
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
NTSK
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
NTSK
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
NTSK
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Netskope Inc at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to Netskope Inc's 28.9, placing Netskope Inc ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs Netskope Inc 67%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.