Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightDDD vs NAVN
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q1 2026

Summary Verdict

DDD: 0NAVN: 5wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
39.4NAVN
check_circleNAVN leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
34.8%NAVN
check_circleNAVN leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
72%NAVN
check_circleNAVN leads
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
4.5%NAVN
check_circleNAVN leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
-18.3%NAVN
check_circleNAVN leads
NRR
DDD
NAVN
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
NAVN
39.4check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
NAVN
34.8%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%
NAVN
72%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%
NAVN
4.5%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%
NAVN
-18.3%check_circle
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
NAVN
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
NAVN
N/A
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
NAVN
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
NAVN
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
NAVN
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Navan, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to Navan, Inc.'s 39.4, placing Navan, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35% vs Navan, Inc. 72%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

person3D SYSTEMS CORP ProfilepersonNavan, Inc. ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons