analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
LZ: 3—ALRM: 2wins
Rule of 40
30.4LZ
21.1ALRM
check_circleLZ leads
Revenue Growth
10.9%LZ
7.6%ALRM
check_circleLZ leads
Gross Margin
66%LZ
66%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
FCF Margin
19.6%LZ
13.6%ALRM
check_circleLZ leads
Operating Margin
3.3%LZ
13.2%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—LZ
—ALRM
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
LZ
30.4check_circle
ALRM
21.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
LZ
10.9%check_circle
ALRM
7.6%
Gross Margin% of revenue
LZ
66%
ALRM
66%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
LZ
19.6%check_circle
ALRM
13.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
LZ
3.3%
ALRM
13.2%check_circle
NRRNet retention
LZ
N/A
ALRM
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
LZ
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Market CapUSD
LZ
N/A
ALRM
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
LZ
N/A
ALRM
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
LZ
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, LEGALZOOM.COM, INC. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, LEGALZOOM.COM, INC. scores 30.4 compared to Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.'s 21.1, placing LEGALZOOM.COM, INC. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at LEGALZOOM.COM, INC. 66% vs Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.