Summary Verdict
LAW: 2—EGHT: 3wins
Rule of 40
-3.2LAW
8.5EGHT
check_circleEGHT leads
Revenue Growth
8.3%LAW
0.1%EGHT
check_circleLAW leads
Gross Margin
75%LAW
67%EGHT
check_circleLAW leads
FCF Margin
-11.5%LAW
8.4%EGHT
check_circleEGHT leads
Operating Margin
-30.7%LAW
2.1%EGHT
check_circleEGHT leads
NRR
—LAW
—EGHT
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
LAW
-3.2
EGHT
8.5check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
LAW
8.3%check_circle
EGHT
0.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
LAW
75%check_circle
EGHT
67%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
LAW
-11.5%
EGHT
8.4%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
LAW
-30.7%
EGHT
2.1%check_circle
NRRNet retention
LAW
N/A
EGHT
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
LAW
N/A
EGHT
0.8x
Market CapUSD
LAW
N/A
EGHT
$266.1M
ARR GrowthYoY
LAW
N/A
EGHT
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
LAW
N/A
EGHT
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, CS Disco, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 8X8 INC /DE/ at 0.8x. On the Rule of 40, CS Disco, Inc. scores -3.2 compared to 8X8 INC /DE/'s 8.5, placing 8X8 INC /DE/ ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at CS Disco, Inc. 75% vs 8X8 INC /DE/ 67%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.