Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightDDD vs LAW
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q1 2026

Summary Verdict

DDD: 2LAW: 3wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
-21.1LAW
check_circleLAW leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
8.8%LAW
check_circleLAW leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
75%LAW
check_circleLAW leads
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
-29.8%LAW
check_circleDDD leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
-31.1%LAW
check_circleDDD leads
NRR
DDD
LAW
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
LAW
-21.1check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
LAW
8.8%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%
LAW
75%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%check_circle
LAW
-29.8%
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%check_circle
LAW
-31.1%
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
LAW
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
LAW
N/A
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
LAW
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
LAW
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
LAW
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus CS Disco, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to CS Disco, Inc.'s -21.1, placing CS Disco, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35% vs CS Disco, Inc. 75%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

person3D SYSTEMS CORP ProfilepersonCS Disco, Inc. ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons