Summary Verdict
KVYO: 5—DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
48.5KVYO
-37.4DDD
check_circleKVYO leads
Revenue Growth
31.6%KVYO
-12.1%DDD
check_circleKVYO leads
Gross Margin
75%KVYO
34%DDD
check_circleKVYO leads
FCF Margin
16.9%KVYO
-25.3%DDD
check_circleKVYO leads
Operating Margin
-5.5%KVYO
-24.8%DDD
check_circleKVYO leads
NRR
—KVYO
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
KVYO
48.5check_circle
DDD
-37.4
Revenue GrowthYoY
KVYO
31.6%check_circle
DDD
-12.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
KVYO
75%check_circle
DDD
34%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
KVYO
16.9%check_circle
DDD
-25.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
KVYO
-5.5%check_circle
DDD
-24.8%
NRRNet retention
KVYO
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
KVYO
N/A
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
KVYO
N/A
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
KVYO
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
KVYO
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, Klaviyo, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Klaviyo, Inc. scores 48.5 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -37.4, placing Klaviyo, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Klaviyo, Inc. 75% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 34%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.