Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightINTA vs ACIW
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q4 2025

Summary Verdict

INTA: 4ACIW: 1wins
Rule of 40
46.0INTA
28.0ACIW
check_circleINTA leads
Revenue Growth
23.0%INTA
10.4%ACIW
check_circleINTA leads
Gross Margin
70%INTA
49%ACIW
check_circleINTA leads
FCF Margin
23.0%INTA
17.6%ACIW
check_circleINTA leads
Operating Margin
-5.2%INTA
18.8%ACIW
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
INTA
ACIW
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
INTA
46.0check_circle
ACIW
28.0
Revenue GrowthYoY
INTA
23.0%check_circle
ACIW
10.4%
Gross Margin% of revenue
INTA
70%check_circle
ACIW
49%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
INTA
23.0%check_circle
ACIW
17.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
INTA
-5.2%
ACIW
18.8%check_circle
NRRNet retention
INTA
N/A
ACIW
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
INTA
3.5x
ACIW
N/A
Market CapUSD
INTA
$1.8B
ACIW
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
INTA
N/A
ACIW
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
INTA
N/A
ACIW
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q4 2025, Intapp, Inc. trades at 3.5x EV/Revenue versus ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Intapp, Inc. scores 46.0 compared to ACI WORLDWIDE, INC.'s 28.0, placing Intapp, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Intapp, Inc. 70% vs ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 49%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

personIntapp, Inc. ProfilepersonACI WORLDWIDE, INC. ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons