analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
DDD: 0—INSE: 5wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
17.3INSE
check_circleINSE leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
-0.1%INSE
check_circleINSE leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
98%INSE
check_circleINSE leads
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
17.5%INSE
check_circleINSE leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
10.0%INSE
check_circleINSE leads
NRR
—DDD
—INSE
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
INSE
17.3check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
INSE
-0.1%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%
INSE
98%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%
INSE
17.5%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%
INSE
10.0%check_circle
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
INSE
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
INSE
N/A
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
INSE
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
INSE
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
INSE
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Inspired Entertainment, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to Inspired Entertainment, Inc.'s 17.3, placing Inspired Entertainment, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35% vs Inspired Entertainment, Inc. 98%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.