analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
INOD: 4—ALRM: 1wins
Rule of 40
61.8INOD
21.1ALRM
check_circleINOD leads
Revenue Growth
47.6%INOD
7.6%ALRM
check_circleINOD leads
Gross Margin
40%INOD
66%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
FCF Margin
14.2%INOD
13.6%ALRM
check_circleINOD leads
Operating Margin
15.8%INOD
13.2%ALRM
check_circleINOD leads
NRR
—INOD
—ALRM
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
INOD
61.8check_circle
ALRM
21.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
INOD
47.6%check_circle
ALRM
7.6%
Gross Margin% of revenue
INOD
40%
ALRM
66%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
INOD
14.2%check_circle
ALRM
13.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
INOD
15.8%check_circle
ALRM
13.2%
NRRNet retention
INOD
N/A
ALRM
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
INOD
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Market CapUSD
INOD
N/A
ALRM
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
INOD
N/A
ALRM
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
INOD
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, INNODATA INC trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, INNODATA INC scores 61.8 compared to Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.'s 21.1, placing INNODATA INC ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at INNODATA INC 40% vs Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.