analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 1—INOD: 4wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
76.2INOD
check_circleINOD leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
58.0%INOD
check_circleINOD leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
35%INOD
check_circleALRM leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
18.1%INOD
check_circleINOD leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
15.0%INOD
check_circleINOD leads
NRR
—ALRM
—INOD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7
INOD
76.2check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%
INOD
58.0%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%check_circle
INOD
35%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%
INOD
18.1%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%
INOD
15.0%check_circle
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
INOD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
INOD
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
INOD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
INOD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
INOD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus INNODATA INC at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to INNODATA INC's 76.2, placing INNODATA INC ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs INNODATA INC 35%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.