analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
GLOO: 2—ACIW: 2wins
Rule of 40
221.4GLOO
24.2ACIW
check_circleGLOO leads
Revenue Growth
307.7%GLOO
6.9%ACIW
check_circleGLOO leads
Gross Margin
—GLOO
47%ACIW
FCF Margin
-86.3%GLOO
17.3%ACIW
check_circleACIW leads
Operating Margin
-114.3%GLOO
16.4%ACIW
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
—GLOO
—ACIW
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
GLOO
221.4check_circle
ACIW
24.2
Revenue GrowthYoY
GLOO
307.7%check_circle
ACIW
6.9%
Gross Margin% of revenue
GLOO
N/A
ACIW
47%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
GLOO
-86.3%
ACIW
17.3%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
GLOO
-114.3%
ACIW
16.4%check_circle
NRRNet retention
GLOO
N/A
ACIW
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
GLOO
1.0xcheck_circle
ACIW
3.0x
Market CapUSD
GLOO
$119.6M
ACIW
$4.4Bcheck_circle
ARR GrowthYoY
GLOO
N/A
ACIW
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
GLOO
N/A
ACIW
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Gloo Holdings, Inc. trades at 1.0x EV/Revenue versus ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. at 3.0x. On the Rule of 40, Gloo Holdings, Inc. scores 221.4 compared to ACI WORLDWIDE, INC.'s 24.2, placing Gloo Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.