analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
GLOO: 2—ACIW: 2wins
Rule of 40
221.4GLOO
28.0ACIW
check_circleGLOO leads
Revenue Growth
307.7%GLOO
10.4%ACIW
check_circleGLOO leads
Gross Margin
—GLOO
49%ACIW
FCF Margin
-86.3%GLOO
17.6%ACIW
check_circleACIW leads
Operating Margin
-114.3%GLOO
18.8%ACIW
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
—GLOO
—ACIW
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
GLOO
221.4check_circle
ACIW
28.0
Revenue GrowthYoY
GLOO
307.7%check_circle
ACIW
10.4%
Gross Margin% of revenue
GLOO
N/A
ACIW
49%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
GLOO
-86.3%
ACIW
17.6%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
GLOO
-114.3%
ACIW
18.8%check_circle
NRRNet retention
GLOO
N/A
ACIW
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
GLOO
N/A
ACIW
N/A
Market CapUSD
GLOO
N/A
ACIW
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
GLOO
N/A
ACIW
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
GLOO
N/A
ACIW
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Gloo Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Gloo Holdings, Inc. scores 221.4 compared to ACI WORLDWIDE, INC.'s 28.0, placing Gloo Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.