analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
GDYN: 5—DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
23.6GDYN
-37.4DDD
check_circleGDYN leads
Revenue Growth
17.5%GDYN
-12.1%DDD
check_circleGDYN leads
Gross Margin
35%GDYN
34%DDD
check_circleGDYN leads
FCF Margin
6.1%GDYN
-25.3%DDD
check_circleGDYN leads
Operating Margin
-0.5%GDYN
-24.8%DDD
check_circleGDYN leads
NRR
—GDYN
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
GDYN
23.6check_circle
DDD
-37.4
Revenue GrowthYoY
GDYN
17.5%check_circle
DDD
-12.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
GDYN
35%check_circle
DDD
34%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
GDYN
6.1%check_circle
DDD
-25.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
GDYN
-0.5%check_circle
DDD
-24.8%
NRRNet retention
GDYN
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
GDYN
N/A
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
GDYN
N/A
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
GDYN
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
GDYN
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. scores 23.6 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -37.4, placing GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. 35% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 34%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.