analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
DDD: 1—GDYN: 4wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
21.9GDYN
check_circleGDYN leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
16.9%GDYN
check_circleGDYN leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
35%GDYN
check_circleDDD leads
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
5.0%GDYN
check_circleGDYN leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
-1.5%GDYN
check_circleGDYN leads
NRR
—DDD
—GDYN
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
GDYN
21.9check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
GDYN
16.9%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%check_circle
GDYN
35%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%
GDYN
5.0%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%
GDYN
-1.5%check_circle
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
GDYN
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
GDYN
N/A
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
GDYN
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
GDYN
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
GDYN
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.'s 21.9, placing GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35% vs GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. 35%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.