analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
GDYN: 2—ALRM: 3wins
Rule of 40
23.6GDYN
21.1ALRM
check_circleGDYN leads
Revenue Growth
17.5%GDYN
7.6%ALRM
check_circleGDYN leads
Gross Margin
35%GDYN
66%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
FCF Margin
6.1%GDYN
13.6%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
Operating Margin
-0.5%GDYN
13.2%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—GDYN
—ALRM
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
GDYN
23.6check_circle
ALRM
21.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
GDYN
17.5%check_circle
ALRM
7.6%
Gross Margin% of revenue
GDYN
35%
ALRM
66%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
GDYN
6.1%
ALRM
13.6%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
GDYN
-0.5%
ALRM
13.2%check_circle
NRRNet retention
GDYN
N/A
ALRM
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
GDYN
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Market CapUSD
GDYN
N/A
ALRM
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
GDYN
N/A
ALRM
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
GDYN
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. scores 23.6 compared to Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.'s 21.1, placing GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. 35% vs Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.