analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
GDYN: 1—ACIW: 4wins
Rule of 40
23.6GDYN
28.0ACIW
check_circleACIW leads
Revenue Growth
17.5%GDYN
10.4%ACIW
check_circleGDYN leads
Gross Margin
35%GDYN
49%ACIW
check_circleACIW leads
FCF Margin
6.1%GDYN
17.6%ACIW
check_circleACIW leads
Operating Margin
-0.5%GDYN
18.8%ACIW
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
—GDYN
—ACIW
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
GDYN
23.6
ACIW
28.0check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
GDYN
17.5%check_circle
ACIW
10.4%
Gross Margin% of revenue
GDYN
35%
ACIW
49%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
GDYN
6.1%
ACIW
17.6%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
GDYN
-0.5%
ACIW
18.8%check_circle
NRRNet retention
GDYN
N/A
ACIW
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
GDYN
N/A
ACIW
N/A
Market CapUSD
GDYN
N/A
ACIW
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
GDYN
N/A
ACIW
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
GDYN
N/A
ACIW
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. scores 23.6 compared to ACI WORLDWIDE, INC.'s 28.0, placing ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. 35% vs ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 49%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.