Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightAPPF vs GDRX
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q1 2026

Summary Verdict

APPF: 4GDRX: 0wins
Rule of 40
33.4APPF
12.3GDRX
check_circleAPPF leads
Revenue Growth
21.5%APPF
0.5%GDRX
check_circleAPPF leads
Gross Margin
86%APPF
GDRX
FCF Margin
11.9%APPF
11.8%GDRX
check_circleAPPF leads
Operating Margin
16.6%APPF
9.9%GDRX
check_circleAPPF leads
NRR
APPF
GDRX
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
APPF
33.4check_circle
GDRX
12.3
Revenue GrowthYoY
APPF
21.5%check_circle
GDRX
0.5%
Gross Margin% of revenue
APPF
86%
GDRX
N/A
FCF MarginFree cash flow
APPF
11.9%check_circle
GDRX
11.8%
Operating MarginGAAP
APPF
16.6%check_circle
GDRX
9.9%
NRRNet retention
APPF
N/A
GDRX
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
APPF
N/A
GDRX
N/A
Market CapUSD
APPF
N/A
GDRX
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
APPF
N/A
GDRX
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
APPF
N/A
GDRX
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q1 2026, AppFolio, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus GoodRx Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, AppFolio, Inc. scores 33.4 compared to GoodRx Holdings, Inc.'s 12.3, placing AppFolio, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

personAppFolio, Inc. ProfilepersonGoodRx Holdings, Inc. ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons