Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightFIG vs ACIW
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q4 2025

Summary Verdict

FIG: 4ACIW: 1wins
Rule of 40
64.3FIG
28.0ACIW
check_circleFIG leads
Revenue Growth
41.0%FIG
10.4%ACIW
check_circleFIG leads
Gross Margin
82%FIG
49%ACIW
check_circleFIG leads
FCF Margin
23.3%FIG
17.6%ACIW
check_circleFIG leads
Operating Margin
-122.2%FIG
18.8%ACIW
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
FIG
ACIW
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
FIG
64.3check_circle
ACIW
28.0
Revenue GrowthYoY
FIG
41.0%check_circle
ACIW
10.4%
Gross Margin% of revenue
FIG
82%check_circle
ACIW
49%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
FIG
23.3%check_circle
ACIW
17.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
FIG
-122.2%
ACIW
18.8%check_circle
NRRNet retention
FIG
N/A
ACIW
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
FIG
N/A
ACIW
N/A
Market CapUSD
FIG
N/A
ACIW
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
FIG
N/A
ACIW
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
FIG
N/A
ACIW
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q4 2025, Figma, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Figma, Inc. scores 64.3 compared to ACI WORLDWIDE, INC.'s 28.0, placing Figma, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Figma, Inc. 82% vs ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 49%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

personFigma, Inc. ProfilepersonACI WORLDWIDE, INC. ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons