analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
EGHT: 3—GDYN: 2wins
Rule of 40
10.3EGHT
21.9GDYN
check_circleGDYN leads
Revenue Growth
2.0%EGHT
16.9%GDYN
check_circleGDYN leads
Gross Margin
66%EGHT
35%GDYN
check_circleEGHT leads
FCF Margin
8.3%EGHT
5.0%GDYN
check_circleEGHT leads
Operating Margin
3.4%EGHT
-1.5%GDYN
check_circleEGHT leads
NRR
—EGHT
—GDYN
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
EGHT
10.3
GDYN
21.9check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
EGHT
2.0%
GDYN
16.9%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
EGHT
66%check_circle
GDYN
35%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
EGHT
8.3%check_circle
GDYN
5.0%
Operating MarginGAAP
EGHT
3.4%check_circle
GDYN
-1.5%
NRRNet retention
EGHT
N/A
GDYN
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
EGHT
N/A
GDYN
N/A
Market CapUSD
EGHT
N/A
GDYN
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
EGHT
N/A
GDYN
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
EGHT
N/A
GDYN
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, 8X8 INC /DE/ trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 8X8 INC /DE/ scores 10.3 compared to GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.'s 21.9, placing GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at 8X8 INC /DE/ 66% vs GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. 35%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.