analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
DDD: 0—RAMP: 5wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
3.2RAMP
check_circleRAMP leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
7.6%RAMP
check_circleRAMP leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
71%RAMP
check_circleRAMP leads
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
-4.4%RAMP
check_circleRAMP leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
10.3%RAMP
check_circleRAMP leads
NRR
—DDD
—RAMP
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
RAMP
3.2check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
RAMP
7.6%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%
RAMP
71%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%
RAMP
-4.4%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%
RAMP
10.3%check_circle
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
RAMP
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
RAMP
N/A
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
RAMP
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
RAMP
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
RAMP
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.'s 3.2, placing LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35% vs LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. 71%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.