Summary Verdict
DDD: 0—QTWO: 5wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
28.7QTWO
check_circleQTWO leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
15.3%QTWO
check_circleQTWO leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
55%QTWO
check_circleQTWO leads
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
13.4%QTWO
check_circleQTWO leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
6.3%QTWO
check_circleQTWO leads
NRR
—DDD
—QTWO
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
QTWO
28.7check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
QTWO
15.3%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%
QTWO
55%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%
QTWO
13.4%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%
QTWO
6.3%check_circle
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
QTWO
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
QTWO
N/A
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
QTWO
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
QTWO
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
QTWO
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Q2 Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to Q2 Holdings, Inc.'s 28.7, placing Q2 Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35% vs Q2 Holdings, Inc. 55%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.