analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
DDD: 0—PRGS: 5wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
57.9PRGS
check_circlePRGS leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
29.1%PRGS
check_circlePRGS leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
81%PRGS
check_circlePRGS leads
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
28.8%PRGS
check_circlePRGS leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
16.6%PRGS
check_circlePRGS leads
NRR
—DDD
—PRGS
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
PRGS
57.9check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
PRGS
29.1%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%
PRGS
81%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%
PRGS
28.8%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%
PRGS
16.6%check_circle
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
PRGS
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
PRGS
N/A
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
PRGS
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
PRGS
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
PRGS
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA's 57.9, placing PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35% vs PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA 81%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.