Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightDDD vs PATH
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q1 2026

Summary Verdict

DDD: 0PATH: 5wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
34.1PATH
check_circlePATH leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
8.3%PATH
check_circlePATH leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
82%PATH
check_circlePATH leads
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
25.8%PATH
check_circlePATH leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
0.3%PATH
check_circlePATH leads
NRR
DDD
PATH
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
PATH
34.1check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
PATH
8.3%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%
PATH
82%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%
PATH
25.8%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%
PATH
0.3%check_circle
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
PATH
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
PATH
N/A
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
PATH
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
PATH
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
PATH
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus UiPath, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to UiPath, Inc.'s 34.1, placing UiPath, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35% vs UiPath, Inc. 82%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

person3D SYSTEMS CORP ProfilepersonUiPath, Inc. ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons