Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightDDD vs OOMA
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q1 2026

Summary Verdict

DDD: 0OOMA: 5wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
17.8OOMA
check_circleOOMA leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
9.5%OOMA
check_circleOOMA leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
150%OOMA
check_circleOOMA leads
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
8.3%OOMA
check_circleOOMA leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
4.9%OOMA
check_circleOOMA leads
NRR
DDD
OOMA
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
OOMA
17.8check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
OOMA
9.5%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%
OOMA
150%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%
OOMA
8.3%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%
OOMA
4.9%check_circle
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
OOMA
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
OOMA
N/A
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
OOMA
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
OOMA
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
OOMA
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus OOMA INC at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to OOMA INC's 17.8, placing OOMA INC ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35% vs OOMA INC 150%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

person3D SYSTEMS CORP ProfilepersonOOMA INC ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons