Summary Verdict
DDD: 0—NABL: 5wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
18.2NABL
check_circleNABL leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
10.4%NABL
check_circleNABL leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
77%NABL
check_circleNABL leads
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
7.8%NABL
check_circleNABL leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
7.0%NABL
check_circleNABL leads
NRR
—DDD
—NABL
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
NABL
18.2check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
NABL
10.4%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%
NABL
77%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%
NABL
7.8%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%
NABL
7.0%check_circle
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
NABL
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
NABL
N/A
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
NABL
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
NABL
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
NABL
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus N-able, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to N-able, Inc.'s 18.2, placing N-able, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35% vs N-able, Inc. 77%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.