Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightDDD vs LIF
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q1 2026

Summary Verdict

DDD: 0LIF: 5wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
37.3LIF
check_circleLIF leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
31.0%LIF
check_circleLIF leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
78%LIF
check_circleLIF leads
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
6.3%LIF
check_circleLIF leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
0.4%LIF
check_circleLIF leads
NRR
DDD
LIF
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
LIF
37.3check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
LIF
31.0%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%
LIF
78%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%
LIF
6.3%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%
LIF
0.4%check_circle
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
LIF
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
LIF
N/A
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
LIF
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
LIF
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
LIF
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Life360, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to Life360, Inc.'s 37.3, placing Life360, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35% vs Life360, Inc. 78%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

person3D SYSTEMS CORP ProfilepersonLife360, Inc. ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons