Summary Verdict
DDD: 0—KVYO: 5wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
38.5KVYO
check_circleKVYO leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
32.5%KVYO
check_circleKVYO leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
76%KVYO
check_circleKVYO leads
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
6.0%KVYO
check_circleKVYO leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
-5.2%KVYO
check_circleKVYO leads
NRR
—DDD
—KVYO
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
KVYO
38.5check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
KVYO
32.5%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%
KVYO
76%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%
KVYO
6.0%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%
KVYO
-5.2%check_circle
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
KVYO
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
KVYO
N/A
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
KVYO
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
KVYO
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
KVYO
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Klaviyo, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to Klaviyo, Inc.'s 38.5, placing Klaviyo, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35% vs Klaviyo, Inc. 76%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.