Summary Verdict
DDD: 0—GDRX: 4wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
12.3GDRX
check_circleGDRX leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
0.5%GDRX
check_circleGDRX leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
—GDRX
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
11.8%GDRX
check_circleGDRX leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
9.9%GDRX
check_circleGDRX leads
NRR
—DDD
—GDRX
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
GDRX
12.3check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
GDRX
0.5%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%
GDRX
N/A
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%
GDRX
11.8%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%
GDRX
9.9%check_circle
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
GDRX
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
GDRX
N/A
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
GDRX
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
GDRX
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
GDRX
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus GoodRx Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to GoodRx Holdings, Inc.'s 12.3, placing GoodRx Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.