analyticsData & Analytics
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
CWAN: 2—VRSK: 3wins
Rule of 40
69.4CWAN
47.1VRSK
check_circleCWAN leads
Revenue Growth
62.7%CWAN
6.8%VRSK
check_circleCWAN leads
Gross Margin
67%CWAN
70%VRSK
check_circleVRSK leads
FCF Margin
6.7%CWAN
40.4%VRSK
check_circleVRSK leads
Operating Margin
1.1%CWAN
44.9%VRSK
check_circleVRSK leads
NRR
—CWAN
—VRSK
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CWAN
69.4check_circle
VRSK
47.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
CWAN
62.7%check_circle
VRSK
6.8%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CWAN
67%
VRSK
70%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CWAN
6.7%
VRSK
40.4%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
CWAN
1.1%
VRSK
44.9%check_circle
NRRNet retention
CWAN
N/A
VRSK
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CWAN
N/A
VRSK
N/A
Market CapUSD
CWAN
N/A
VRSK
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
CWAN
N/A
VRSK
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CWAN
N/A
VRSK
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Verisk Analytics, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. scores 69.4 compared to Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s 47.1, placing Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. 67% vs Verisk Analytics, Inc. 70%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Data & Analytics sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.